home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT3152>
- <title>
- Nov. 26, 1990: America Abroad
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- Nov. 26, 1990 The Junk Mail Explosion!
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 32
- AMERICA ABROAD
- The Bum Rap on Bush
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Strobe Talbott
- </p>
- <p> For three months, it was Saddam Hussein vs. most of the
- world. Then, last week, it suddenly seemed to be George Bush
- vs. most of his own countrymen, or at least everyone with
- access to a microphone, an op-ed page or a pulpit. Criticisms
- ranged from the reasonable (an appeal for the Pentagon not to
- cancel troop rotations) to the ridiculous (the suggestion that
- the U.S. is defending Arab princes' right to polygyny and Swiss
- bank accounts). But the significance of the controversy lay
- less in the substance of specific gripes, caveats and misgivings
- than in the overall tone of collective dithering. An observer,
- including one in Baghdad, might conclude that the American body
- politic was showing the first signs of a failure of nerve.
- </p>
- <p> As Bush has acknowledged, his attempts to explain U.S.
- policy have been less than brilliant. But there has been a hard
- core of convincing rationale in what he has said from the
- beginning. Immediately after Saddam's invasion of Kuwait, Bush
- stated that if the aggression is allowed to "stand," it will
- invite more such outrages around the world and give Saddam an
- unacceptable degree of control over the lifeblood of the world
- economy. (To denigrate the importance of oil with talk of
- "cheap gas" is itself a cheap debating tactic.) From the very
- day of the invasion, the explicit objective of U.S. policy has
- been not just deterrence of further Iraqi expansion but also
- the rollback of Iraq from Kuwait.
- </p>
- <p> At least tacitly, many of Bush's critics accept that goal.
- Insofar as there were intelligible themes in last week's
- cacophony of kibitzing, ends were less at issue than means.
- Bush has been relying on a combination of political, economic
- and military pressures. His decision two weeks ago to beef up
- the U.S. armed presence is consistent with his previous action
- and rhetoric. The buildup is also compatible with his preference
- for peaceful suasion. Unless the threat of force is credible,
- diplomacy and sanctions don't stand a chance.
- </p>
- <p> Quite a few of the critics seem to be saying, in effect,
- Let's talk Saddam out of Kuwait if we can, but the option of
- blasting him out is just too ugly to contemplate. Play the game
- that way, and Saddam wins.
- </p>
- <p> According to another grumble, Bush is betraying his earlier
- commitment to multilateralism and the new world order. That too
- is a bum rap. The international alliance, which Bush has been
- praised for assembling, could have taken shape only behind
- Desert Shield. The coalition against Saddam will evaporate the
- moment its members become convinced that Bush is not serious
- about going to war if necessary. When he sent more troops to
- the gulf, he was saying, simply, I'm prepared to go to war if
- necessary.
- </p>
- <p> Apparently only then did many Americans begin to believe
- their own President. That in itself is a disturbing commentary
- on Bush's standing. His considerable achievements as a world
- statesman have made his performance on the home front,
- particularly his erratic, shortsighted mismanagement of the
- economy, seem all the worse by contrast.
- </p>
- <p> Yet it is precisely on the home front that his otherwise
- able leadership in the gulf crisis has run into its most
- ominous problem to date. As a result, the chance of success is
- diminished. All that is left of the great American consensus
- on the gulf is a chorus of calls for a "national debate." Fair
- enough. Congress and the public have every right to insist that
- the Administration justify the risks it is asking its citizens
- to run. But criticism of policy should meet the same standards
- of logic and efficacy as policy itself. So far, what the
- Administration is doing makes more sense than most of what its
- critics are saying.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-